http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/soundoff/10594 Sound Off Batch Data Processor | Saturday, Jun 9 2007 8:30 PM Last Updated: Saturday, Jun 9 2007 8:33 PM Reader: The Bakersfield Californian has been my hometown newspaper for more than 60 years. Sadly, I have noticed over the past quarter century that the headlines about matters involving law enforcement have changed. It has become almost routine to see bold print that casts a negative slant on the actions of not only the Bakersfield Police Department but most all of Kern County law enforcement. That would be especially true of the district attorney's office. I was reminded of this bias again on June 3. There it was at the bottom of Page B1: &quot;Fleeing Driver Shot by Officers.&quot; At first glance the reader would infer that this was just another arbitrary shooting. Contrast that headline with March of 1970 when a BPD officer was involved in a shooting during an armed robbery arrest, and the bold print read &quot;Officer nabs armed pair, shoots one.&quot; In both cases the suspect shot was armed and resisting arrest. What is significantly different is how The Californian chose to present the facts to the reading public. Shame on you. -- A. Riley Parker Jenner: Here are few other headlines that ran with stories published in the last 12 months. Somehow you omitted them from your complaint: &quot;Police chase, arrest four suspects in home robbery&quot; &quot;Hours-long search through southeast Bakersfield area ends without bloodshed&quot; &quot;Agencies honor officers for work against vehicle theft&quot; &quot;Police bust large indoor pot operation&quot; &quot;SWAT team standoff at motel ends peacefully&quot; &quot;Officer won't let guard down&quot; &quot;Efforts in helping turn around lives of troubled students draw praise&quot; Those are a few of them. I didn't bother to include the headlines from all the stories covering the promotions of officers. We publish every one. I also didn't mention the yearlong series on what it takes to survive the BPD's academy, nor did I include the many stories about PAL -- the Police Athletic League -- in which officers give young people recreational opportunities and the chance to get to know police officers as people. Yes, when an officer fires his weapon, it's a news story. And every story gets a headline. But your suggestion that we're slanting coverage to cast police in a negative light is not only unsupported, it's wrong. Reader: I was just calling to comment on your front page picture in The Californian. I had to wash my dog's mouth out with Listerine this morning after he brought it in. Bad choice of a picture for young kids at home from school that might be picking up the paper. It might as well have been Playboy or Hustler. Bad choice. -- Karen Hodges Reader: I want to protest that horrible picture that you put on the front page. Is this a family newspaper or is it pornographic? I have a 16-year-old grandson and I don't appreciate this kind of picture going before his eyes. What on Earth are you people thinking of? I don't think you are. -- June Engle Jenner: I spoke to a half-dozen readers Monday who were upset by the photo and headline that accompanied that day's Page One story about the pervasiveness of pornography in our society. The photo showed five members of the band known as the Pussycat Dolls performing at a concert. Although the women were wearing skimpy costumes, the photo was not pornographic in any way. But it ran with an overline that said &quot;Prime time for porn?&quot; and a headline that said: &quot;SeXXX sells.&quot; Readers accused us of trying to use sex to sell papers. Many were so angry by the presentation they didn't bother to read the story. Ironically, the story was a strong indictment of the prevalence of porn in our culture. It talked about the negative effect the focus on sexuality has had on young people -- particularly on young girls. We localized the story with photos and quotes from local residents who shared their concerns about the trend. In hindsight, I wish we had simply run the story with no photo and a straightforward headline stating something like: &quot;Porn permeating culture is especially damaging to young girls.&quot; I regret that we gave some readers the idea we were trying to use sex to sell the paper, and apologize to those who were offended. Reader: Thanks for answering my letter. Reading The Californian is the way I start my day -- with the front page. Readers viewpoints, Herb Benham (he answers letters, too), obituary notices. Wish you could write more about what is going on in Bakersfield with illegal immigrants. That's the second war in our country I believe. I like the Sports section, especially the pictures of the young athletes in all sports, not just the stars. Probably only time they will have their picture in paper. We need someone writing for senior citizens. I like to find very helpful articles. Don't care for the page of pictures. Would if it was Bakersfield, Kern County, California. I feel The Californian is a paper for local people. I don't want the L.A. paper. -- Norma Dorris Jenner: Thanks for the nice note, Norma. Our salute to the boys and girls who were outstanding athletes in the season that just ended will run June 22-24. Reader: I wished to express my delight with the addition of W. Bruce Cameron's column to the Opinion page. I had not seen Mr. Cameron's column before. I find it humorous, in a manner similar to Dave Barry, but with an additional splash of the ironies of life from which we all suffer. I have really enjoyed the past couple of columns, and look forward to reading more in the future. Thank you again for including this breath of fresh air in The Californian. -- Ryan Olson Sound Off Batch Data Processor | Saturday, Jun 9 2007 8:30 PM Last Updated: Saturday, Jun 9 2007 8:33 PM Reader: The Bakersfield Californian has been my hometown newspaper for more than 60 years. Sadly, I have noticed over the past quarter century that the headlines about matters involving law enforcement have changed. It has become almost routine to see bold print that casts a negative slant on the actions of not only the Bakersfield Police Department but most all of Kern County law enforcement. That would be especially true of the district attorney's office. I was reminded of this bias again on June 3. There it was at the bottom of Page B1: &quot;Fleeing Driver Shot by Officers.&quot; At first glance the reader would infer that this was just another arbitrary shooting. Contrast that headline with March of 1970 when a BPD officer was involved in a shooting during an armed robbery arrest, and the bold print read &quot;Officer nabs armed pair, shoots one.&quot; In both cases the suspect shot was armed and resisting arrest. What is significantly different is how The Californian chose to present the facts to the reading public. Shame on you. -- A. Riley Parker Jenner: Here are few other headlines that ran with stories published in the last 12 months. Somehow you omitted them from your complaint: &quot;Police chase, arrest four suspects in home robbery&quot; &quot;Hours-long search through southeast Bakersfield area ends without bloodshed&quot; &quot;Agencies honor officers for work against vehicle theft&quot; &quot;Police bust large indoor pot operation&quot; &quot;SWAT team standoff at motel ends peacefully&quot; &quot;Officer won't let guard down&quot; &quot;Efforts in helping turn around lives of troubled students draw praise&quot; Those are a few of them. I didn't bother to include the headlines from all the stories covering the promotions of officers. We publish every one. I also didn't mention the yearlong series on what it takes to survive the BPD's academy, nor did I include the many stories about PAL -- the Police Athletic League -- in which officers give young people recreational opportunities and the chance to get to know police officers as people. Yes, when an officer fires his weapon, it's a news story. And every story gets a headline. But your suggestion that we're slanting coverage to cast police in a negative light is not only unsupported, it's wrong. Reader: I was just calling to comment on your front page picture in The Californian. I had to wash my dog's mouth out with Listerine this morning after he brought it in. Bad choice of a picture for young kids at home from school that might be picking up the paper. It might as well have been Playboy or Hustler. Bad choice. -- Karen Hodges Reader: I want to protest that horrible picture that you put on the front page. Is this a family newspaper or is it pornographic? I have a 16-year-old grandson and I don't appreciate this kind of picture going before his eyes. What on Earth are you people thinking of? I don't think you are. -- June Engle Jenner: I spoke to a half-dozen readers Monday who were upset by the photo and headline that accompanied that day's Page One story about the pervasiveness of pornography in our society. The photo showed five members of the band known as the Pussycat Dolls performing at a concert. Although the women were wearing skimpy costumes, the photo was not pornographic in any way. But it ran with an overline that said &quot;Prime time for porn?&quot; and a headline that said: &quot;SeXXX sells.&quot; Readers accused us of trying to use sex to sell papers. Many were so angry by the presentation they didn't bother to read the story. Ironically, the story was a strong indictment of the prevalence of porn in our culture. It talked about the negative effect the focus on sexuality has had on young people -- particularly on young girls. We localized the story with photos and quotes from local residents who shared their concerns about the trend. In hindsight, I wish we had simply run the story with no photo and a straightforward headline stating something like: &quot;Porn permeating culture is especially damaging to young girls.&quot; I regret that we gave some readers the idea we were trying to use sex to sell the paper, and apologize to those who were offended. Reader: Thanks for answering my letter. Reading The Californian is the way I start my day -- with the front page. Readers viewpoints, Herb Benham (he answers letters, too), obituary notices. Wish you could write more about what is going on in Bakersfield with illegal immigrants. That's the second war in our country I believe. I like the Sports section, especially the pictures of the young athletes in all sports, not just the stars. Probably only time they will have their picture in paper. We need someone writing for senior citizens. I like to find very helpful articles. Don't care for the page of pictures. Would if it was Bakersfield, Kern County, California. I feel The Californian is a paper for local people. I don't want the L.A. paper. -- Norma Dorris Jenner: Thanks for the nice note, Norma. Our salute to the boys and girls who were outstanding athletes in the season that just ended will run June 22-24. Reader: I wished to express my delight with the addition of W. Bruce Cameron's column to the Opinion page. I had not seen Mr. Cameron's column before. I find it humorous, in a manner similar to Dave Barry, but with an additional splash of the ironies of life from which we all suffer. I have really enjoyed the past couple of columns, and look forward to reading more in the future. Thank you again for including this breath of fresh air in The Californian. -- Ryan Olson en-us The Californian is looking for news.&nbsp; Sometimes the stories they find are not<strong> </strong><font size="3"><strong>that</strong> </font>interesting or newsworthy so they stretch what little controversy they can out of an otherwise dull story. http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/soundoff/10594/#c_103351 http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/soundoff/10594/#c_103351 The Californian is looking for news.&nbsp; Sometimes the stories they find are not<strong> </strong><font size="3"><strong>that</strong> </font>interesting or newsworthy so they stretch what little controversy they can out of an otherwise dull story. &quot; I want to protest that horrible picture that you put on the front page. Is this a family newspaper or is it pornographic? I have a 16-year-old grandson and I don't appreciate this kind of picture going before his eyes&quot;, if your kid has never seen a picture like this or worse, you two don't communicate or he keeps them under the mattress at the monastery. http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/soundoff/10594/#c_103440 http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/soundoff/10594/#c_103440 &quot; I want to protest that horrible picture that you put on the front page. Is this a family newspaper or is it pornographic? I have a 16-year-old grandson and I don't appreciate this kind of picture going before his eyes&quot;, if your kid has never seen a picture like this or worse, you two don't communicate or he keeps them under the mattress at the monastery. <div class="blogcommentbody"><em>Speaking from experience, almost everyone in&nbsp;law enforcement&nbsp;tolerates the&nbsp;media only because they&nbsp;have to.</em></div> <div class="blogcommentbody"></div> <div class="blogcommentbody">And vice versa, likely as not.</div> http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/soundoff/10594/#c_103443 http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/soundoff/10594/#c_103443 <div class="blogcommentbody"><em>Speaking from experience, almost everyone in&nbsp;law enforcement&nbsp;tolerates the&nbsp;media only because they&nbsp;have to.</em></div> <div class="blogcommentbody"></div> <div class="blogcommentbody">And vice versa, likely as not.</div> Speaking from my experience &mdash; as a cops and courts reporter for more than 30 years &mdash; cops respect the truth and if it is fairly and objectively portrayed in news articles, they will respect the reporter.<br /> <br /> Same holds true with all others in the criminal justice system, including defendants.<br /> <br /> Using cops as an example, there is a difference between bad stories about good cops and good stories about bad cops. <br /> <br /> The best stories are when everyone talks to you. http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/soundoff/10594/#c_103478 http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/soundoff/10594/#c_103478 Speaking from my experience &mdash; as a cops and courts reporter for more than 30 years &mdash; cops respect the truth and if it is fairly and objectively portrayed in news articles, they will respect the reporter.<br /> <br /> Same holds true with all others in the criminal justice system, including defendants.<br /> <br /> Using cops as an example, there is a difference between bad stories about good cops and good stories about bad cops. <br /> <br /> The best stories are when everyone talks to you. <p><font color="#ff0000">But Steve you didn't answer the question about the pornographic pic?</font></p> <p><font color="#ff0000">Ron.</font></p> http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/soundoff/10594/#c_103486 http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/soundoff/10594/#c_103486 <p><font color="#ff0000">But Steve you didn't answer the question about the pornographic pic?</font></p> <p><font color="#ff0000">Ron.</font></p> Having worked with cops and the media I always avoided at all costs common interviews. I was not fond of interviews and deferred to our press office unless I was specially ordered to participate.<br /> The CHP on the other hand were real prim Donna's and there was never a reporter they did not want to impress. That made it easy for me and I deferred to them. Having said that , there was always reporters from the SacBee they preferred  to speak with, some because they were fair and some because they were almost groupies that made negative events positive. <br /> The Californian from my point of view fall into the groupie category, as they just brush by any thing that might be construed as negative to law enforcement. They can be amusing though,I always enjoyed their coverage of the Sparks crying jags and their whimsical coverage such as the one a few years ago where they fired one hundred and one shots at suspects and some of the suspects survived. One of the other stories the Californian covers involves shooting, I can almost quote the story and the police investigators conclusions before they are ever printed, they are boiler plate journalism.<br /> http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/soundoff/10594/#c_103493 http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/soundoff/10594/#c_103493 Having worked with cops and the media I always avoided at all costs common interviews. I was not fond of interviews and deferred to our press office unless I was specially ordered to participate.<br /> The CHP on the other hand were real prim Donna's and there was never a reporter they did not want to impress. That made it easy for me and I deferred to them. Having said that , there was always reporters from the SacBee they preferred  to speak with, some because they were fair and some because they were almost groupies that made negative events positive. <br /> The Californian from my point of view fall into the groupie category, as they just brush by any thing that might be construed as negative to law enforcement. They can be amusing though,I always enjoyed their coverage of the Sparks crying jags and their whimsical coverage such as the one a few years ago where they fired one hundred and one shots at suspects and some of the suspects survived. One of the other stories the Californian covers involves shooting, I can almost quote the story and the police investigators conclusions before they are ever printed, they are boiler plate journalism.<br /> Allred,<br /> &nbsp; The picture wasn't close to being pornographic.&nbsp; http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/soundoff/10594/#c_103516 http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/soundoff/10594/#c_103516 Allred,<br /> &nbsp; The picture wasn't close to being pornographic.&nbsp; <p>Murphyslaw, you've gotta take the *NOSES* into account when judging pornography, remember?</p> <p><a href="http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/firedup/8122">http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/firedup/8122</a></p> http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/soundoff/10594/#c_103531 http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/soundoff/10594/#c_103531 <p>Murphyslaw, you've gotta take the *NOSES* into account when judging pornography, remember?</p> <p><a href="http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/firedup/8122">http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/firedup/8122</a></p> Murph, DUCK!! Those darn gang bangers are shooting at us again!!! http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/soundoff/10594/#c_103567 http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/soundoff/10594/#c_103567 Murph, DUCK!! Those darn gang bangers are shooting at us again!!! I saw the same picture on a Pizza slice on Ebay, it was being offered by Larry Flynt. Should I bid on it? http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/soundoff/10594/#c_103575 http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/soundoff/10594/#c_103575 I saw the same picture on a Pizza slice on Ebay, it was being offered by Larry Flynt. Should I bid on it? Wow, the battle of the adult kindergartners. http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/soundoff/10594/#c_103625 http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/soundoff/10594/#c_103625 Wow, the battle of the adult kindergartners. <p>OH NO !&nbsp; I missed the porn on the Californians front page?&nbsp; I could have saved myself the cost of shipment in the plain brown wrapper?&nbsp;&nbsp; RATS !</p> <p>NOTE TO TBC FROM READER:&nbsp; Stop putting those Macy's, Penny's, Mervyns and Kohls lingerie ads in your paper.&nbsp; Showing skimpy clothing on well built models is pornographic you know.&nbsp; All those bikini panties and bras...disgusting I tell you..and I am offended.</p> http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/soundoff/10594/#c_103640 http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/soundoff/10594/#c_103640 <p>OH NO !&nbsp; I missed the porn on the Californians front page?&nbsp; I could have saved myself the cost of shipment in the plain brown wrapper?&nbsp;&nbsp; RATS !</p> <p>NOTE TO TBC FROM READER:&nbsp; Stop putting those Macy's, Penny's, Mervyns and Kohls lingerie ads in your paper.&nbsp; Showing skimpy clothing on well built models is pornographic you know.&nbsp; All those bikini panties and bras...disgusting I tell you..and I am offended.</p> <p><font color="#ff0000">Steve I didnt see the Pic I was referring to a post a viewer made. </font></p> <p><font color="#ff0000">Ron.</font></p> http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/soundoff/10594/#c_103642 http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/soundoff/10594/#c_103642 <p><font color="#ff0000">Steve I didnt see the Pic I was referring to a post a viewer made. </font></p> <p><font color="#ff0000">Ron.</font></p> <p>From Mr. Jenner's reply, <font color="#0000ff">&quot;Ironically, the story was a strong indictment of the prevalence of porn in our culture. It talked about the negative effect the focus on sexuality has had on young people -- particularly on young girls.&quot;</font></p> <p>This is an interesting topic unto itself, but as I see it, a society's porn is a <em>reflection</em> of a society's overall attitude toward sex, not a <em>cause</em> of it.</p> <p>I have seen <em>beautiful</em>&nbsp; &quot;porn.&quot;&nbsp; I have seen video clips that -- far from degrading the woman -- made me want to <em>hug</em> her, <em>hold</em> her, <em>protect</em> her.</p> <p>This type of &quot;porn&quot; is more prevalent in European countries, where their attitudes toward sex are incomparably healthier.</p> <p>The more gross and stupid-looking stuff tends to be of American or Arab vintage.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/soundoff/10594/#c_103643 http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/soundoff/10594/#c_103643 <p>From Mr. Jenner's reply, <font color="#0000ff">&quot;Ironically, the story was a strong indictment of the prevalence of porn in our culture. It talked about the negative effect the focus on sexuality has had on young people -- particularly on young girls.&quot;</font></p> <p>This is an interesting topic unto itself, but as I see it, a society's porn is a <em>reflection</em> of a society's overall attitude toward sex, not a <em>cause</em> of it.</p> <p>I have seen <em>beautiful</em>&nbsp; &quot;porn.&quot;&nbsp; I have seen video clips that -- far from degrading the woman -- made me want to <em>hug</em> her, <em>hold</em> her, <em>protect</em> her.</p> <p>This type of &quot;porn&quot; is more prevalent in European countries, where their attitudes toward sex are incomparably healthier.</p> <p>The more gross and stupid-looking stuff tends to be of American or Arab vintage.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Anyone ever read 'Mean Justice'? Pretty good book about the "law" in Bakersfield. Anyone know whats with this sense of superiority about anyone working with the PD? Normally, when you exit your car you wait for traffic. I saw a Police Technician almost get hit for swinging her door open then hurrying to get to the middle of the street. If anything, they aren't being reported negatively enough. </p> http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/soundoff/10594/#c_104744 http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/soundoff/10594/#c_104744 <p>Anyone ever read 'Mean Justice'? Pretty good book about the "law" in Bakersfield. Anyone know whats with this sense of superiority about anyone working with the PD? Normally, when you exit your car you wait for traffic. I saw a Police Technician almost get hit for swinging her door open then hurrying to get to the middle of the street. If anything, they aren't being reported negatively enough. </p> I'm not&nbsp;familiar with the superiority you are referring to, but I am familiar with ignorant people.&nbsp; http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/soundoff/10594/#c_104820 http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/soundoff/10594/#c_104820 I'm not&nbsp;familiar with the superiority you are referring to, but I am familiar with ignorant people.&nbsp; Edward Humes is the Author.&nbsp; Might be hard to find in town. http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/soundoff/10594/#c_104869 http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/soundoff/10594/#c_104869 Edward Humes is the Author.&nbsp; Might be hard to find in town. &quot; <div class="blogcommentbody">I'm not&nbsp;familiar with the superiority you are referring to, but I am familiar with ignorant people.&quot;&nbsp; Thank God you are one of us!&nbsp;</div> <a class="blogviolation" href="../../../home/ReportViolation/Comment/104820"><br /> </a> http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/soundoff/10594/#c_104961 http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/soundoff/10594/#c_104961 &quot; <div class="blogcommentbody">I'm not&nbsp;familiar with the superiority you are referring to, but I am familiar with ignorant people.&quot;&nbsp; Thank God you are one of us!&nbsp;</div> <a class="blogviolation" href="../../../home/ReportViolation/Comment/104820"><br /> </a> if they are its with good reason!<br /> <br /> do you have any idea how many MILLIONS of dollars this county/city has wasted on lawsuits ???<br /> <br /> the kid who got beat up in jail =$20 million all the 6 or was it 9 people who  like 10 years in jail due to the bogus child molestation ring= $20 million each. and a long list of other lawsuits that were the result of law enforcement messing up have all cost us millions of dollars DOLLARS THAT COULD HAVE GONE TO FIXING OUR ROADS.<br /> <br /> and they have done quite a few other thing that have cost any money yet (but probably will soon) like the ex mayor of Arvin he was a problem to them so the nite before the election they had him arrested on charges of child molestation and then let him go the next day saying there wasnt enough evidence ????????? come on how crooked can you get http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/soundoff/10594/#c_126484 http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/soundoff/10594/#c_126484 if they are its with good reason!<br /> <br /> do you have any idea how many MILLIONS of dollars this county/city has wasted on lawsuits ???<br /> <br /> the kid who got beat up in jail =$20 million all the 6 or was it 9 people who  like 10 years in jail due to the bogus child molestation ring= $20 million each. and a long list of other lawsuits that were the result of law enforcement messing up have all cost us millions of dollars DOLLARS THAT COULD HAVE GONE TO FIXING OUR ROADS.<br /> <br /> and they have done quite a few other thing that have cost any money yet (but probably will soon) like the ex mayor of Arvin he was a problem to them so the nite before the election they had him arrested on charges of child molestation and then let him go the next day saying there wasnt enough evidence ????????? come on how crooked can you get <h5><b>February 11, 2008 (both print and on line version of TBC) the story line is:</b></h5> <h5><span style="color: #ff0000"><b>&quot;Officers Slay Parolee&quot; </b></span><b><br /> </b></h5> <h5><b>A quick check with Dictionary dot com shows the following definition for the word slay: </b></h5> <h5>&nbsp;</h5> <h5><span style="color: #3366ff"><b>&mdash;Synonyms</b></span><b> 1. murder, slaughter, massacre, butcher, assassinate. 2. annihilate, ruin. </b></h5> <p>&nbsp;</p> <h5><b>No media bias against cops? Yeah----Right! Tell me a lie I <i>can</i> believe.</b></h5> <p>&nbsp;</p> <h5><b>The headline over the story speaks for itself. Of course there is a bias!. While it may be unintentional, there is a bias against law enforcement by TBC and this bias is to generate reader interest. </b></h5> <h5><b>Regardless of motive this bias is inexcusable. This particular police shooting has inflamed tempers in an area of Bakersfield known for gang violence and has generated threats against Law Enforcement. For the Bakersfield Californian to further fan the flames with an obviously biased headline is worse than tabloid journalism:</b><span style="color: #ff0000"><b> It can inflame tempers and cost officers their life! </b></span></h5> <p>&nbsp;</p> <h5><b>Monday-morning-quarterbacking is always the easiest but anyone with a brain can see these officers were simply defending themselves when they came under deadly gunfire from a felon. </b></h5> <h5><br /> Next time try this headline: <span style="color: #0000ff">&quot;Convicted Felon Fires On Police and Is Killed!&quot;<br /> </span></h5> <p><br /> &nbsp;</p> http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/soundoff/10594/#c_194713 http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/soundoff/10594/#c_194713 <h5><b>February 11, 2008 (both print and on line version of TBC) the story line is:</b></h5> <h5><span style="color: #ff0000"><b>&quot;Officers Slay Parolee&quot; </b></span><b><br /> </b></h5> <h5><b>A quick check with Dictionary dot com shows the following definition for the word slay: </b></h5> <h5>&nbsp;</h5> <h5><span style="color: #3366ff"><b>&mdash;Synonyms</b></span><b> 1. murder, slaughter, massacre, butcher, assassinate. 2. annihilate, ruin. </b></h5> <p>&nbsp;</p> <h5><b>No media bias against cops? Yeah----Right! Tell me a lie I <i>can</i> believe.</b></h5> <p>&nbsp;</p> <h5><b>The headline over the story speaks for itself. Of course there is a bias!. While it may be unintentional, there is a bias against law enforcement by TBC and this bias is to generate reader interest. </b></h5> <h5><b>Regardless of motive this bias is inexcusable. This particular police shooting has inflamed tempers in an area of Bakersfield known for gang violence and has generated threats against Law Enforcement. For the Bakersfield Californian to further fan the flames with an obviously biased headline is worse than tabloid journalism:</b><span style="color: #ff0000"><b> It can inflame tempers and cost officers their life! </b></span></h5> <p>&nbsp;</p> <h5><b>Monday-morning-quarterbacking is always the easiest but anyone with a brain can see these officers were simply defending themselves when they came under deadly gunfire from a felon. </b></h5> <h5><br /> Next time try this headline: <span style="color: #0000ff">&quot;Convicted Felon Fires On Police and Is Killed!&quot;<br /> </span></h5> <p><br /> &nbsp;</p> <p>Good point Curt!</p> <p>No &quot;yellow journalism&quot; there eh sf?</p> <p>Anything to stir the pot</p> <p>Sell ink!</p> <p>I could also offer headline:</p> <p><b>&quot;Convicted Felon Fires at Police - Situation Normalized, BPD TCB. All Ends Well!&quot;</b></p> http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/soundoff/10594/#c_194715 http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/soundoff/10594/#c_194715 <p>Good point Curt!</p> <p>No &quot;yellow journalism&quot; there eh sf?</p> <p>Anything to stir the pot</p> <p>Sell ink!</p> <p>I could also offer headline:</p> <p><b>&quot;Convicted Felon Fires at Police - Situation Normalized, BPD TCB. All Ends Well!&quot;</b></p> <p><span style="font-size: 12px"><font face="Verdana">I am disgusted about Ms. Henry's response to my plea to not post Officer Eddy's picture on the website immediately following the officer involved shooting.  Further, as soon as she received my email, the picture appearing on the website was edited to a close-up of Officer Eddy.  As her struggle for control and power continued,  the amendment to the picture was not deemed newsworthy, nor was it an enhancement to the story. Her response below shows her blantant disregard for officer & public safety.   Her "doubt" that posting his picture would put Officer Eddy in any more danger is not good enough for me.  It is not good enough for Officer Eddy's family either.  </font></span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 12px"><font face="Verdana">At least Jenner acknowledged the ensuing headline was slanted and inappropriate.  Ms. Henry's response showed a callous indifference to the danger the police face everyday.  The quest for moral and responsible journalism continues for TBC.  </font></span></p> <p> </p> <p><span style="font-size: 12px"><font face="Verdana">Ms. Cruse:<br /> <br /> Below is the reply from my editor.<br /> <br /> Thanks,<br /> <br /> Louis<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Louis Medina<br /> Staff Writer<br /> The Bakersfield Californian<br /> 1707 Eye St.<br /> Bakersfield, CA 93302<br /> Tel. 661-395-7496<br /> Fax 661-395-7519<br />  <br /> <br /> <br /> ------ Forwarded Message<br /> <b>From: </b>Lois Henry <lhenry@bakersfield.com><br /> <b>Date: </b>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 19:00:45 -0800<br /> <b>To: </b>Louis Medina <lmedina@bakersfield.com><br /> <b>Conversation: </b>BPD Officer Eddy<br /> <b>Subject: </b>Re: BPD Officer Eddy<br /> <br /> Good point about Lucifer. But Officer Eddy is well known in the area as a gang officer so I doubt shielding his photo will keep him any safer than our posting it.<br /> <br /> <br /> On 2/10/08 6:54 PM, "Louis Medina" <lmedina@bakersfield.com> wrote:<br /> <br /> </font></span></p> <blockquote><span style="font-size: 12px"><br /> <font face="Verdana">Hi, Lois:<br /> <br /> The following e-mail with some genuine concerns just came in from a reader. Can you consider it and reply?<br /> <br /> Thanks,<br /> <br /> Louis<br /> <br /> <br /> Louis Medina<br /> Staff Writer<br /> The Bakersfield Californian<br /> 1707 Eye St.<br /> Bakersfield, CA 93302<br /> Tel. 661-395-7496<br /> Fax 661-395-7519<br />  <br /> <br /> <br /> ------ Forwarded Message<br /> <b>From: </b>Julie Cruse <jcruse@zapline.com><br /> <b>Date: </b>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 18:54:03 -0800<br /> <b>To: </b><lmedina@bakersfield.com><br /> <b>Subject: </b>BPD Officer Eddy<br /> <br /> </font></span><span style="font-size: 12px"><font face="Arial">Dear Mr. Medina,<br /> </font><font face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><br /> </font><font face="Arial">In your story about the officer involved shooting, you mentioned there are threats that are being called into the BPD.  Why would you post a picture of Officer Eddy arresting a suspect?  As I'm sure you are aware, these gang members have nothing to lose by targeting  BPD Officers, and you and your editor just gave them an opportunity to see what Officer Eddy looks like.  Further, are you aware of any gang affiliation by Darnell Pierce?  Just posting that picture can give a rival gang another reason for retaliation.  I urge you to PLEASE take that photo off the website.  This is not only for the safety of Officer Eddy, but for his family and the whole Bakersfield Police Department. <br /> </font></span></blockquote> http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/soundoff/10594/#c_195537 http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/soundoff/10594/#c_195537 <p><span style="font-size: 12px"><font face="Verdana">I am disgusted about Ms. Henry's response to my plea to not post Officer Eddy's picture on the website immediately following the officer involved shooting.  Further, as soon as she received my email, the picture appearing on the website was edited to a close-up of Officer Eddy.  As her struggle for control and power continued,  the amendment to the picture was not deemed newsworthy, nor was it an enhancement to the story. Her response below shows her blantant disregard for officer & public safety.   Her "doubt" that posting his picture would put Officer Eddy in any more danger is not good enough for me.  It is not good enough for Officer Eddy's family either.  </font></span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 12px"><font face="Verdana">At least Jenner acknowledged the ensuing headline was slanted and inappropriate.  Ms. Henry's response showed a callous indifference to the danger the police face everyday.  The quest for moral and responsible journalism continues for TBC.  </font></span></p> <p> </p> <p><span style="font-size: 12px"><font face="Verdana">Ms. Cruse:<br /> <br /> Below is the reply from my editor.<br /> <br /> Thanks,<br /> <br /> Louis<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Louis Medina<br /> Staff Writer<br /> The Bakersfield Californian<br /> 1707 Eye St.<br /> Bakersfield, CA 93302<br /> Tel. 661-395-7496<br /> Fax 661-395-7519<br />  <br /> <br /> <br /> ------ Forwarded Message<br /> <b>From: </b>Lois Henry <lhenry@bakersfield.com><br /> <b>Date: </b>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 19:00:45 -0800<br /> <b>To: </b>Louis Medina <lmedina@bakersfield.com><br /> <b>Conversation: </b>BPD Officer Eddy<br /> <b>Subject: </b>Re: BPD Officer Eddy<br /> <br /> Good point about Lucifer. But Officer Eddy is well known in the area as a gang officer so I doubt shielding his photo will keep him any safer than our posting it.<br /> <br /> <br /> On 2/10/08 6:54 PM, "Louis Medina" <lmedina@bakersfield.com> wrote:<br /> <br /> </font></span></p> <blockquote><span style="font-size: 12px"><br /> <font face="Verdana">Hi, Lois:<br /> <br /> The following e-mail with some genuine concerns just came in from a reader. Can you consider it and reply?<br /> <br /> Thanks,<br /> <br /> Louis<br /> <br /> <br /> Louis Medina<br /> Staff Writer<br /> The Bakersfield Californian<br /> 1707 Eye St.<br /> Bakersfield, CA 93302<br /> Tel. 661-395-7496<br /> Fax 661-395-7519<br />  <br /> <br /> <br /> ------ Forwarded Message<br /> <b>From: </b>Julie Cruse <jcruse@zapline.com><br /> <b>Date: </b>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 18:54:03 -0800<br /> <b>To: </b><lmedina@bakersfield.com><br /> <b>Subject: </b>BPD Officer Eddy<br /> <br /> </font></span><span style="font-size: 12px"><font face="Arial">Dear Mr. Medina,<br /> </font><font face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><br /> </font><font face="Arial">In your story about the officer involved shooting, you mentioned there are threats that are being called into the BPD.  Why would you post a picture of Officer Eddy arresting a suspect?  As I'm sure you are aware, these gang members have nothing to lose by targeting  BPD Officers, and you and your editor just gave them an opportunity to see what Officer Eddy looks like.  Further, are you aware of any gang affiliation by Darnell Pierce?  Just posting that picture can give a rival gang another reason for retaliation.  I urge you to PLEASE take that photo off the website.  This is not only for the safety of Officer Eddy, but for his family and the whole Bakersfield Police Department. <br /> </font></span></blockquote> <p>I was recently appalled when I read the Bakersfield Californian newspaper headline in regards to an officer involved shooting.  The headline read "Officers Slay Parolee."  To me the title sounds as if the police committed a crime.  After reading the article I realized several Bakersfield Police Officers returned fire in self defense.  The suspect, a parolee died from the injuries, and the Officer was hospitalized due to his injuries. </p> <p>My concern is the way this story was titled.  I have seen it in the past, but this is going overboard.  The media needs to be more responsible when selecting their headlines and be cautious of the words chosen; after all, they are reporting the facts, not their believes.</p> <p>Law Enforcement is a tough job; and when a differenct picture is painted to the community it is simply not fair nor moral.</p> <p> </p> http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/soundoff/10594/#c_195704 http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/soundoff/10594/#c_195704 <p>I was recently appalled when I read the Bakersfield Californian newspaper headline in regards to an officer involved shooting.  The headline read "Officers Slay Parolee."  To me the title sounds as if the police committed a crime.  After reading the article I realized several Bakersfield Police Officers returned fire in self defense.  The suspect, a parolee died from the injuries, and the Officer was hospitalized due to his injuries. </p> <p>My concern is the way this story was titled.  I have seen it in the past, but this is going overboard.  The media needs to be more responsible when selecting their headlines and be cautious of the words chosen; after all, they are reporting the facts, not their believes.</p> <p>Law Enforcement is a tough job; and when a differenct picture is painted to the community it is simply not fair nor moral.</p> <p> </p>