http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/tkozy/46430 South Carolina, &quot;Offenses Against Morality and Decency&rsquo; Governor Sanford. It's in South Carolina's Code of Laws, Title 16--Crimes and Offenses, Chapter 15 SECTION 16-15-60. Adultery or fornication. Any man or woman who shall be guilty of the crime of adultery or fornication shall be liable to indictment and, on conviction, shall be severally punished by a fine of not less than one hundred dollars nor more than five hundred dollars or imprisonment for not less than six months nor more than one year or by both fine and imprisonment, at the discretion of the court. SECTION 16-15-70. &quot;Adultery&quot; defined. &quot;Adultery&quot; is the living together and carnal intercourse with each other or habitual carnal intercourse with each other without living together of a man and woman when either is lawfully married to some other person. http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/6/24/746372/-Adultery-is-a-crime-in-South-Carolina! South Carolina, &quot;Offenses Against Morality and Decency&rsquo; Governor Sanford. It's in South Carolina's Code of Laws, Title 16--Crimes and Offenses, Chapter 15 SECTION 16-15-60. Adultery or fornication. Any man or woman who shall be guilty of the crime of adultery or fornication shall be liable to indictment and, on conviction, shall be severally punished by a fine of not less than one hundred dollars nor more than five hundred dollars or imprisonment for not less than six months nor more than one year or by both fine and imprisonment, at the discretion of the court. SECTION 16-15-70. &quot;Adultery&quot; defined. &quot;Adultery&quot; is the living together and carnal intercourse with each other or habitual carnal intercourse with each other without living together of a man and woman when either is lawfully married to some other person. http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/6/24/746372/-Adultery-is-a-crime-in-South-Carolina! en-us Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:16:34 PDT <p>Any man or woman who shall be guilty of the crime of adultery or fornication shall be liable to indictment and, on conviction, shall be severally punished by a fine of not less than one hundred dollars nor more than five hundred dollars or <span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);">imprisonment for not less than six months nor more than one year or by both fine and imprisonment</span></p> http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/tkozy/46430/#c_414571 http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/tkozy/46430/#c_414571 <p>Any man or woman who shall be guilty of the crime of adultery or fornication shall be liable to indictment and, on conviction, shall be severally punished by a fine of not less than one hundred dollars nor more than five hundred dollars or <span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);">imprisonment for not less than six months nor more than one year or by both fine and imprisonment</span></p> <p>What about fraud and missue of taxpayers money? (see next post)</p> http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/tkozy/46430/#c_414574 http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/tkozy/46430/#c_414574 <p>What about fraud and missue of taxpayers money? (see next post)</p> <p><span style="font-size: x-large"><font size="5">Taxpayers fund Sanford affair</font></span></p> <p>&nbsp;Earlier today, Mark Sanford <a href="http://www.thestate.com/local/story/838823.html" target="_blank">told</a> The State he went to Argentina about 18 months ago on a taxpayer-funded Commerce Department trip.</p> <blockquote> <p>Sanford, in a brief interview in the nation's busiest airport, said he has been to the city twice before, most recently about a year and half ago during a Commerce Department trip.</p> </blockquote> <p>So he had an affair with a woman from Argentina, and he recently visited there on the taxpayer dime.</p> <p>According to Sanford's travel reports, he spent <a href="http://www.demconwatchblog.com/diary/1817/governor-sanford-has-had-a-strange-interest-in-argentina-for-a-while-now" target="_blank">$21,488</a> on a trip to Brazil, Argentina, and China. However much of that can be allocated to his trip to Argentina, it still means taxpayers likely spent thousands on his affair.</p> <p>Wow.</p> <p>In addition, Ben Smith <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0609/Sanfords_travels.html" target="_blank">notes</a> two taxpayer-funded trips to Argentina made by Sanford in the mid-1990s, though Sanford indicated he met the woman with whom he had the affair eight years ago.</p> http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/tkozy/46430/#c_414575 http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/tkozy/46430/#c_414575 <p><span style="font-size: x-large"><font size="5">Taxpayers fund Sanford affair</font></span></p> <p>&nbsp;Earlier today, Mark Sanford <a href="http://www.thestate.com/local/story/838823.html" target="_blank">told</a> The State he went to Argentina about 18 months ago on a taxpayer-funded Commerce Department trip.</p> <blockquote> <p>Sanford, in a brief interview in the nation's busiest airport, said he has been to the city twice before, most recently about a year and half ago during a Commerce Department trip.</p> </blockquote> <p>So he had an affair with a woman from Argentina, and he recently visited there on the taxpayer dime.</p> <p>According to Sanford's travel reports, he spent <a href="http://www.demconwatchblog.com/diary/1817/governor-sanford-has-had-a-strange-interest-in-argentina-for-a-while-now" target="_blank">$21,488</a> on a trip to Brazil, Argentina, and China. However much of that can be allocated to his trip to Argentina, it still means taxpayers likely spent thousands on his affair.</p> <p>Wow.</p> <p>In addition, Ben Smith <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0609/Sanfords_travels.html" target="_blank">notes</a> two taxpayer-funded trips to Argentina made by Sanford in the mid-1990s, though Sanford indicated he met the woman with whom he had the affair eight years ago.</p> <p>Keeps gettin' better.&nbsp;</p> <p>I don't care was letter they have after their names, guys like this need to pay the piper.</p> http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/tkozy/46430/#c_414578 http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/tkozy/46430/#c_414578 <p>Keeps gettin' better.&nbsp;</p> <p>I don't care was letter they have after their names, guys like this need to pay the piper.</p> <br /> <p>Limbaugh says:<br /> <br /> Nobody caught Sanford doing anything.</p> http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/tkozy/46430/#c_414580 http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/tkozy/46430/#c_414580 <br /> <p>Limbaugh says:<br /> <br /> Nobody caught Sanford doing anything.</p> <p><em>Any man or woman who shall be guilty of the crime of adultery or fornication shall be liable to indictment and, on conviction,</em></p> <p>Which is why he went to&nbsp;Argentina to do it.&nbsp; Duh.&nbsp;&nbsp; Although&nbsp;I bet they have the silly rule too.</p> http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/tkozy/46430/#c_414583 http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/tkozy/46430/#c_414583 <p><em>Any man or woman who shall be guilty of the crime of adultery or fornication shall be liable to indictment and, on conviction,</em></p> <p>Which is why he went to&nbsp;Argentina to do it.&nbsp; Duh.&nbsp;&nbsp; Although&nbsp;I bet they have the silly rule too.</p> <p>Random </p> <p>I don't think Argentina has that law. Not that I could find anyway.</p> <p>Do you suppose the adultery or fornication may have happened more than the three trips out of state?</p> <br /> <p>&nbsp;</p> http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/tkozy/46430/#c_414588 http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/tkozy/46430/#c_414588 <p>Random </p> <p>I don't think Argentina has that law. Not that I could find anyway.</p> <p>Do you suppose the adultery or fornication may have happened more than the three trips out of state?</p> <br /> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Wow and that's nothing compared to what they do to jay walkers.&nbsp; Good ol' South Carolina.&nbsp; A Bush red state, I presume?</p> http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/tkozy/46430/#c_414666 http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/tkozy/46430/#c_414666 <p>Wow and that's nothing compared to what they do to jay walkers.&nbsp; Good ol' South Carolina.&nbsp; A Bush red state, I presume?</p>